Employee? Independent Contractor?

Health clubs face difficult decisions when determining whether to retain
personal trainers, instructors, therapists, and other workers as employees
or independent contractors.

There may be significant advantages in reduced costs and potential liability
when it classifies them as independent contractors (independents). Among them:  not having to withhold taxes, pay minimum or overtime wages, pay into Social Security or Medicare, or fund insurance. Independents also aren’t covered by discrimination- or employee-protection laws. Clubs are generally not liable for the negligence of independents, but can be for that of employees.

These benefits, however, must be weighed against the potential dangers of misclassifying an employee as an independent. 

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS), the Department of Labor (DOL), and most states have increased their focus on worker classifications via audits and lawsuits. Misclassification generates substantial losses in federal and state tax revenues, as well as losses in unemployment insurance and workers’ compensation funds.

As a result, agencies are becoming far more skeptical when examining  whether workers have been properly classified.

A club that improperly classifies employees as independents may be forced to pay back taxes, fines, penalties, fees, and interest.

Workers often challenge their employment status via wage claims and lawsuits, and the DOL’s website encourages aggrieved workers to do so. And the IRS allows workers to file a Form SS-8 to have it determine their correct employment status.

Class actions against businesses similar to health clubs, e.g., dance studios, have resulted in multi-million-dollar verdicts and settlements. Employers can be liable for all unpaid wages, overtime and vacation pay, penalties equal to the unpaid wages, and the workers’ attorney’s fees.

Uber and Lyft currently face misclassification class actions that involve COVID-19. These lawsuits claim that, because both misclassify drivers as independents, they therefore owe them paid sick leave. These same types of claims could be raised against health clubs.

Proper classification is a complex legal issue, and there’s no bright-line test for ascertaining status. The IRS, DOL, and many states have different tests for doing so. For example, California passed a law, effective January 1, which makes it clear that virtually all trainers, instructors, and similar workers should be deemed employees, because they provide services similar to those offered by a club.

Generally, the key factor differentiating an employee from an independent is control. The more control a club has over a worker’s conduct, training, finances, and schedule, the more likely it is that they’ll be considered an employee. If, for instance, the club schedules their services, collects fees, dictates the services provided, and evaluates them—the worker is probably not an independent. 

For additional information or questions, please contact Norm Finkel.

This article has been published by Club Business International, a publication offered through the International Health, Racquet and Sportsclub Association (ihrsa.org).  

[DISCLAIMER – This information is solely for information purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Please contact SFBBG with all legal questions.]

Related Articles

Rep goes toe-to-toe with manufacturer — and wins every round

Rep goes toe-to-toe with manufacturer — and wins every round

Promoting the sale of electrical insulation used in power transmission and distribution lines is undoubtedly a seductive enough field all by itself. But mix in a lawsuit over unpaid commissions and a flailing attempt to dismiss it, and soon, the same way sex and violence sells movie tickets, the enchantment with electrical insulation sales becomes palpable.

Protecting Your Brand and Your Wallet: Navigating Trademark Fraud Challenges

Protecting Your Brand and Your Wallet: Navigating Trademark Fraud Challenges

Fraudulent practices within the trademark industry have threatened brand owners for years, with scammers continuously refining their methods. Recognizable names such as WTP (World Trademark Publishing), TMP, WW Trademarks, Trademark Registro, and individuals impersonating attorneys or USPTO officers are among those behind these schemes.