Recent Decision Affecting the Americans with Disabilities Act

On Wednesday, June 12, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit found, for the first time, that extreme obesity qualifies as a disability under the Americans with Disabilities Act, but only if caused by an underlying physiological disorder.

The case comes at a time when views on disability are evolving. The American Medical Association designated obesity as a disease in 2013. While the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and various federal courts have decided that obesity alone should entitle afflicted workers to certain protections, other federal courts—and now the Seventh Circuit, which includes Illinois—have required workers to show that an underlying medical condition is contributing to their obesity before the ADA is triggered.

If you have any questions about the decision, or any other employment matter, please contact Norm Finkel at norm.finkel@sfnr.com or Matt Tyrrell at matt.tyrrell@sfnr.com, or call (312) 648-2300.

To view a complete copy of the court decision, click here.

Related Articles

Danielle Pearlman Presents at JUF Event

Danielle Pearlman Presents at JUF Event

SFBBG real estate tax reduction attorney, Danielle L. Pearlman, presented at JUF Professionals Network Nightcaps & Noshes on September 14th at the Bryn Mawr Country Club in Lincolnwood.

SFBBG Prevails in Illinois Appellate Court

SFBBG Prevails in Illinois Appellate Court

On August 9, 2022, SFBBG attorneys, Phil Zisook and Bill Klein, prevailed in an Illinois Appellate Court case where our clients were sued concerning a failed real estate transaction. The proposed transaction involved the transfer of three parcels of real estate consisting of a golf course in Michigan, a Chicago office building, and a River North condominium.

SFBBG Wins Dismissal of Federal Wiretap Suit

SFBBG Wins Dismissal of Federal Wiretap Suit

On April 25, 2022, SFBBG’s Norm Finkel and Matthew Tyrrell obtained a victory on behalf of a firm client in a federal suit asserting that the client violated the federal wiretap act and engaged in other tortious conduct.